Does there have to be a reason?

Fleetwood Mac

It’s funny how some records get re-evaluated over time.

Some albums, like Bruce Springsteen’s Nebraska

online pharmacy buy synthroid no prescription with best prices today in the USA

, Dexy’s Midnight Runners’ Don’t Stand Me Down and The Beastie Boys’ Paul’s Boutique are now frequently held up as great

online pharmacy buy lasix no prescription with best pr

order iversun online in the best USA pharmacy www.islington-chiropractic.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/wiki/wiki-iversun.html no prescription with fast delivery drugstore

ices today

order amoxicillin online in the best USA pharmacy www.islington-chiropractic.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/wiki/wiki-amoxicillin.html no prescription with fast delivery drugstore

in the USA

albums.

And I am more than happy to agree. BUT: There was a time when these were held up as failures. And another album that comes into that list is Tusk by Fleetwood Mac, from 1979, their follow-up to ridiculously successful Rumours.

Why are these records re-evaluated? Were the critics wrong, the bands too ahead of their time, the public not ready?

Whatever – the title track alone of Tusk is worth the price of admission…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.